|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
07/03/2022 |
Actualizado : |
30/11/2022 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
VASEN, F.; SIERRA, M. |
Afiliación : |
FEDERICO VASEN, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; MIGUEL OSCAR SIERRA PEREIRO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
"The Hardest Task"-peer review and the evaluation of technological activities. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Minerva, 2022, Volume 60, Issue 3, pages 375-395. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09461-0 |
ISSN : |
0026-4695 (print); 1573-1871 (electronic) |
DOI : |
10.1007/s11024-022-09461-0 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Accepted 24 January 2022; Published 07 March 2022; To be published September 2022. -- Corresponding author: Federico Vasen, fvasen@uba.ar ---
This work was supported by Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica [grant PICT2018-2794]. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Technology development and innovation are fundamentally different from scientific research. However, in many circumstances, they are evaluated jointly and by the same processes. In these cases, peer review -the most usual procedure for evaluating research - is also applied to the evaluation of technological products and innovation activities. This can lead to unfair results and end up discouraging the involvement of researchers in these fields. This paper analyzes the evaluation processes in Uruguay's National System of Researchers. In this system, all members' activities, both scientific and technological, are evaluated by peer committees. Based on documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews, the difficulties faced by evaluators in assessing technology products are explored. The article highlights the persistence of a linear conception of the link between science and technology and describes the obstacles to assimilate the particularities of technological activities. Refereed publications are presented as the only uncontested product. Other types of output are reviewed with suspicion. This study emphasizes the need for specific mechanisms to evaluate technological production within academic careers.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 |
Palabras claves : |
Latin America; National system of researchers; Peer review; Research evaluation; Technological outputs; Uruguay. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
Marc : |
LEADER 02398naa a2200241 a 4500 001 1062792 005 2022-11-30 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0026-4695 (print); 1573-1871 (electronic) 024 7 $a10.1007/s11024-022-09461-0$2DOI 100 1 $aVASEN, F. 245 $a"The Hardest Task"-peer review and the evaluation of technological activities.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 500 $aArticle history: Accepted 24 January 2022; Published 07 March 2022; To be published September 2022. -- Corresponding author: Federico Vasen, fvasen@uba.ar --- This work was supported by Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica [grant PICT2018-2794]. 520 $aABSTRACT.- Technology development and innovation are fundamentally different from scientific research. However, in many circumstances, they are evaluated jointly and by the same processes. In these cases, peer review -the most usual procedure for evaluating research - is also applied to the evaluation of technological products and innovation activities. This can lead to unfair results and end up discouraging the involvement of researchers in these fields. This paper analyzes the evaluation processes in Uruguay's National System of Researchers. In this system, all members' activities, both scientific and technological, are evaluated by peer committees. Based on documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews, the difficulties faced by evaluators in assessing technology products are explored. The article highlights the persistence of a linear conception of the link between science and technology and describes the obstacles to assimilate the particularities of technological activities. Refereed publications are presented as the only uncontested product. Other types of output are reviewed with suspicion. This study emphasizes the need for specific mechanisms to evaluate technological production within academic careers. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 653 $aLatin America 653 $aNational system of researchers 653 $aPeer review 653 $aResearch evaluation 653 $aTechnological outputs 653 $aUruguay 700 1 $aSIERRA, M. 773 $tMinerva, 2022, Volume 60, Issue 3, pages 375-395. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09461-0
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
13/11/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Abstracts/Resúmenes |
Autor : |
CAPRA, G.; BETTINI, R. |
Afiliación : |
GUSTAVO ENRIQUE CAPRA CASSINONI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ROBERTO BETTINI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Caracterización tecnológica de la producción de hortalizas bajo invernáculos en la zona sur del Uruguay. |
Fecha de publicación : |
1992 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: SUH (Sociedad Uruguay de Horticultura); COLHOR (Confederación Latinoamericana de Horticultura); Congreso Iberoamericano, 1., Congreso Latinoamericano, 5., Congreso Nacional de Horticultura, 4. Resúmenes. Montevideo (Uruguay): SUH, COLHOR, 1992. |
Páginas : |
p59 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Thesagro : |
CULTIVOS DE INVERNADERO; FACTORES DE PRODUCCION; HORTALIZAS; TECNOLOGIA APROPIADA; URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/11987/1/congreso-horticultura-4o.-1992-p.59.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00776naa a2200193 a 4500 001 1004022 005 2018-11-13 008 1992 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aCAPRA, G. 245 $aCaracterización tecnológica de la producción de hortalizas bajo invernáculos en la zona sur del Uruguay. 260 $c1992 300 $ap59 650 $aCULTIVOS DE INVERNADERO 650 $aFACTORES DE PRODUCCION 650 $aHORTALIZAS 650 $aTECNOLOGIA APROPIADA 650 $aURUGUAY 700 1 $aBETTINI, R. 773 $tIn: SUH (Sociedad Uruguay de Horticultura); COLHOR (Confederación Latinoamericana de Horticultura); Congreso Iberoamericano, 1., Congreso Latinoamericano, 5., Congreso Nacional de Horticultura, 4. Resúmenes. Montevideo (Uruguay): SUH, COLHOR, 1992.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|